
Full Text
Hesham R Omar1,* Amit Lale2
1Internal Medicine Department, Telehospitalist Sound Physicians, Chicago, Illinois, USA2Pre-Medical Student, Ohio Wesleyan University, Delaware, Ohio, USA
*Corresponding author: Hesham R Omar, Internal Medicine Department, Telehospitalist Sound Physicians, Chicago, Illinois, USA, Tel: 312- 714-9272; E-mail: Hesham_omar2003@yahoo.com
The Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness (ESCAPE) trial was a randomized control trial conducted to determine the safety of using a Pulmonary Artery Catheter (PAC) to guide therapy in patients hospitalized with severe heart failure. A study from the ESCAPE trial suggests that Rise in Serum Creatinine (RSC) in acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF) is not a negative sign, especially if fluid overload is optimally treated. More aggressive diuresis is usually employed on 1st day of ADHF hospitalization followed by down titration of diuretics as the degree of congestion decreases, and rise of 1st follow-up creatinine is expected. We studied the characteristics and outcomes of subjects with versus without rise of 1st follow-up creatinine. Rise in 1st follow-up creatinine was not associated with any of 12 ESCAPE trial outcomes variables that we examined. This argues against discontinuing diuretic therapy in an overloaded ADHF patient merely because of rise in 1st follow-up creatinine. Since the kidney in this instance is acting appropriately to diurese a congested patient, we find that this benign rise in 1st follow up creatinine is a reflection of renal success through protecting the patient from the graver danger of cardiorespiratory failure.
Rise in Serum Creatinine (RSC) is expected during hospitalization for acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF) due to effect of intravenous diuresis and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition by angiotens in converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. There is sufficient evidence suggesting that the RSC in ADHF is not associated with worse outcomes [1,2], especially if fluid overload is optimally treated [3]. Rises in serum creatinine in ADHF don’t always indicate true kidney injury [4]. Hence, RSC and permissive acute kidney injury (AKI) [5] may be more appropriate than Worsening Renal Function(WRF) and AKI [6]. More aggressive diuresis is usually employed on arrival to emergency room and1st day of ADHF hospitalization by emergency physicians and admitting hospitalists, followed by down titration of as degree of congestion decreases, and therefore rise of 1st follow-up creatinine is expected. In this analysis from ESCAPE trial, we studied the characteristics and outcomes of subjects with -versus without- rise of 1st follow-up creatinine.
Our findings confirm that rise in 1st follow-up creatinine in the setting of aggressive diuresis during ADHF is not associated with worse outcomes, and therefore aggressiveness of diuresis should mainly be guided by volume status rather than renal functions.
Paradoxically, patients with rise in 1st follow-up creatinine had lower degree of decongestion from admission-to-discharge evident in lower negative fluid balance and lower decrease in RAP. This is likely because the group without rise in 1st follow-up creatinine probably had more renal congestion due to Worse Left Ventricle (higher LVESD and LVEDD) and worse pulmonary artery pressures, and is reflected in their higher baseline creatinine, and therefore diuresis rather benefited the kidney and improved kidney functions through renal decongestion, unlike patients with rise in 1st follow-up creatinine who had less renal congestion (due to lower PASP, PADP and better LVESD and LVESD) and therefore aggressive diuresis led to creatinine rise.
To the same extent, we have previously demonstrated that creatinine rise on admission with ADHF is due to renal congestion rather than low cardiac output and therefore an improvement in renal function would be expected with diuresis in cases with renal congestion [7]. These findings also suggest that more aggressive diuresis may be initiated in more severe right-side ADHF with expected renal congestion. In this analysis, we have confirmed the benign nature of rise in 1st follow-up creatinine during ADHF hospitalization up to 6-months following discharge -even in patients with IDDM. This argues against discontinuing or minimizing diuretic therapy in an overloaded ADHF patient merely because of fear of rise in 1st follow-up creatinine. Since the kidney in this instance is acting appropriately to diurese a congested patient, we find that this benign rise in 1st follow up creatinine is rather a reflection of renal success -not failure- through protecting the patient from the graver danger of cardiorespiratory failure.
Among 433 ESCAPE trial patients (mean age 56 years, 74% men) with Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) 19%, serum creatinine was 1.51 ± 0.62 mg/dL at baseline and1.49 ± 0.63 mg/dLon 1st check (day 3). A total of 35.7% (133/373) of cases had a rise in 1st followup creatinine, with a magnitude of creatinine increase of 0.30 ± 0.28 mg/dL, which represents 22.9% increase relative to baseline. Among patient with rise in 1st follow-up creatinine, 41.6% (52/125) had creatinine improvement on discharge. Patients with rise in 1st follow-up creatinine had a lower baseline creatinine (1.41 ± 0.57 mg/ dL vs. 1.56 ± 0.65 mg/dL, P=0.024) and higher maximum in-hospital creatinine (1.88 ± 0.91 mg/dL vs. 1.59 ± 0.72 mg/dL, P=0.002). Patient with rise in 1st follow-up creatinine were more likely to have insulindependent diabetes Mellitus (IDDM, 25.8% vs. 13.4%, P=0.003). Table 1 compares patients with versus without rise in 1st follow-up creatinine.
Patients with rise in 1st follow-up creatinine had significantly lower left Ventricular End-Diastolic Diameter (LVEDD, 6.36 cm vs. 6.75 cm, P=0.009), lower Left Ventricular End-Systolic Diameter (LVESD, 5.57 cm vs. 6.04 cm, P=0.003), lower pulmonary artery diastolic pressure (PADP, 25.9 mmHg vs. 29.0 mmHg, P=0.038) and a trend towards lower pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP, 53.2 vs. 57.8, P=0.056).There was no difference between both groups in Right Atrial Pressure (RAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, IVC during inspiration and expiration, B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP), Jugular Venous Distension (JVD), and JVD>12 cm, presence of rales, S3 gallop, hepatomegaly, positive hepatojugular reflux, presence of ascites, or presence of 2+ pitting edema. There was also no difference between both groups with regards to cardiac output (4.11 vs. 3.79, P=0.219), LVEF, and peak VO2.
Patients with rise in 1st follow-up creatinine required lower, but non-significant, in-hospital furosemide dose (281 mg vs. 327 mg, P=0.330), and lower increase in furosemide dose in-hospital relative to baseline (50% vs 103%, P=0.276), compared with subjects without rise in 1st follow-up creatinine. Despite higher BMI on admission (30.2Kg/ m2 vs. 28.6 Kg/m2, P=0.048) and discharge (29.00 Kg/m2 vs. 27.12 Kg/ m2, P=0.017), patients with rise in 1st follow-up creatinine had less degree of decongestion evident in the significantly lower negative fluid balance (2.88 vs. 4.12 L, P=0.029) and a significantly lower decease in RAP from baseline to final check (-1.91 vs. -5.26, P=0.05) and a trend towards less decrease in inspiration and expiration IVC diameter from admission-to-discharge. Rise in 1st follow-up creatinine was not associated with any of 12 ESCAPE trial outcomes variables that we studied (Table 1). We have also repeated the analysis of these outcomes in patients with IDDM and we found no significant difference in all 12 outcomes (all P>0.1).
| Rise in 1st creatinine | No rise in 1st creatinine | P-value | |
| (n=133) | (n=240) | ||
| (n=240 | |||
| Demographics and comorbidities | |||
| Age (years, m ± SD) | 57.08 ± 13.22 | 56.09 ± 14.02 | 0.503 |
| BMI (Kg/m2, m ± SD) | 30.18 ± 7.51 | 28.64 ± 6.12 | 0.048 |
| Admission weight (Kg, m ± SD) | 86.58 ± 21.53 | 85.69 ± 19.71 | 0.69 |
| Discharge weight (Kg, m ± SD) | 82.98 ± 21.08 | 81.11 ± 19.41 | 0.413 |
| Male % (n) | 73.7% (98/133) | 75.8% (182/240) | 0.646 |
| Black race % (n) | 29.3% (39/133) | 25% (60/240) | 0.365 |
| CABG % (n) | 29.5% (39/132) | 28.9% (69/240) | 0.891 |
| COPD % (n) | 18.2% (24/132) | 15.5% (37/239) | 0.502 |
| IDDM % (n) | 25.8% (34/132) | 13.4% (32/239) | 0.003 |
| DM on OHG % (n) | 22% (29/132) | 17.6% (42/239) | 0.303 |
| Hepatic disease % (n) | 7.6% (10/132) | 8.4% (20/239) | 0.789 |
| Stroke % (n) | 9.1% (12/132) | 10% (24/239) | 0.767 |
| AFib % (n) | 28% (37/132) | 29.7% (71/239) | 0.734 |
| ICD % (n) | 22.7% (30/132) | 30.1% (72/239) | 0.127 |
| Pacemaker % (n) | 21.2% (28/132) | 24.7% (59/239) | 0.45 |
| Baseline physical examination | |||
| JVD % (n) | 89.7% (113/126) | 94.5% (222/235) | 0.094 |
| JVP>12 cmH2O % (n) | 50.8% (64/126) | 58.3% (137/235) | 0.171 |
| Rales % (n) | 58% (76/131) | 51.5% (123/239) | 0.227 |
| Hepatomegaly % (n) | 54.6% (71/130) | 59.7% (142/238) | 0.348 |
| HJR % (n) | 77.3% (99/128) | 80.9% (186/230) | 0.427 |
| Ascites % (n) | 40% (52/130) | 37.7% (89/236) | 0.667 |
| 2+ peripheral edema % (n) | 40.5% (53/131) | 37.2% (89/239) | 0.543 |
| Baseline laboratory values | |||
| Na | 136.98 ± 4.16 | 136.39 ± 4.62 | 0.22 |
| BUN | 34.34 ± 25.24 | 35.92 ± 21.33 | 0.524 |
| creatinine | 1.41 ± 0.57 | 1.56 ± 0.65 | 0.024 |
| BNP | 941 ± 1242 | 1101 ± 1425 | 0.327 |
| Hct | 37.09 ± 4.69 | 38.09 ± 5.66 | 0.088 |
| Total bilirubin | 0.94 ± 0.51 | 0.83 ± 0.55 | 0.094 |
| Baseline echocardiography & CPET | |||
| LVEDD (cm, m ± SD) | 6.36 ± 1.03 | 6.75 ± 1.17 | 0.009 |
| LVESD (cm, m ± SD) | 5.57 ± 1.13 | 6.04 ± 1.20 | 0.003 |
| LVEF | 21 ± 10 | 19 ± 9 | 0.197 |
| IVC (ins) (cm, m ± SD) | 1.60 ± 0.68 | 1.66 ± 0.72 | 0.597 |
| IVC (exp) (cm, m ± SD) | 2.18 ± 0.53 | 2.23 ± 0.64 | 0.51 |
| Collpasability index | 28.4 ± 20.5 | 28.8 ± 20.9 | 0.9 |
| Peak VO2 (Mlmin-1 kg-1, m ± SD) | 11.2 ± 2.6 | 11.8 ± 4.0 | 0.538 |
| Baseline central hemodynamic parameters | |||
| RAP (mmHg, m ± SD) | 13.2 ± 7.6 | 13.7 ± 6.9 | 0.726 |
| PASP (mmHg, m ± SD) | 53.2 ± 15.4 | 57.8 ± 13.3 | 0.056 |
| PADP (mmHg, m ± SD) | 25.9 ± 8.3 | 29.0 ± 9.1 | 0.038 |
| PCWP (mmHg, m ± SD) | 24.4 ± 8.7 | 26.0 ± 9.1 | 0.306 |
| CI(L/min/m2, m ± SD)) | 2.09 ± 0.78 | 1.92 ± 0.52 | 0.147 |
| COP (L/min, m ± SD) | 4.11 ± 1.70 | 3.79 ± 1.10 | 0.219 |
| Furosemideutilization | |||
| Baseline furosemide (mg, m ± SD) | 244 ± 165 | 244 ± 196 | 0.994 |
| In-hospital furosemide (mg, m ± SD) | 281 ± 209 | 327 ± 481 | 0.33 |
| % increase of furosemide* | 50 ± 160 | 103 ± 491 | 0.276 |
| Parametersof decongestion | |||
| Weight loss (Kg, m ± SD) | 2.88 ± 4.21 | 4.12 ± 5.23 | 0.029 |
| RAP decrease (mmHg, m ± SD) | 1.91 ± 7.15 | 5.26 ± 10.18 | 0.05 |
| IVC (ins) decrease (cm, m ± SD) | 0.15 ± 0.60 | 0.39 ± 0.76 | 0.089 |
| IVC (exp) decrease (cm, m ± SD) | 0.16 ± 0.53 | 0.38 ± 0.67 | 0.073 |
| Outcomes | |||
| In-hospital death % (n) | 40% (10/25) | 30% (15/50) | 0.386 |
| 30-day death % (n) | 5.3% (7/133) | 4.3% (11/240) | 0.769 |
| 6-month death % (n) | 18.8 % (25/133) | 20.8% (50/240) | 0.638 |
| 6-month rehosp % (n) | 55.6% (74/133) | 58.3% (140/240) | 0.614 |
| 6-month HF rehosp % (n) | 42.9% (57/133) | 46.7% (112/240) | 0.479 |
| 6-month death cardiac rehospm card transplant% (n) | 51.1% (68/133) | 57.5% (138/240) | 0.236 |
| 6-month death any rehospm card transplant% (n) | 63.9% (85/133) | 67.9% (163/240) | 0.432 |
| Death & CV rehosp% (n) | 48.6% (17/35) | 57% (45/79) | 0.407 |
| Hospital duration(d, m ± SD) | 8.42 ± 6.12 | 9.55 ± 6.86 | 0.118 |
| Total days in-hosp (1st 180 days) | 15.5 ± 15.6 | 18.1 ± 19.0 | 0.186 |
| No. of hospitalization (6-month) | 2.0 ± 1.1 | 2.1 ± 1.4 | 0.539 |
| Days to 1st rehosp (d, m ± SD) | 64 ± 45 | 66 ± 46 | 0.834 |
Table 1: Comparison of ESCAPE trial patients with versus without rise in 1st creatinine.
SD: Standard Deviation; BMI: Body Mass Index; CABG: Coronary Artery Bypass Graft; COPD: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; IDDM: InsulinDependent Diabetes Mellitus; DM: Diabetes Mellitus; OHG: Oral Hypoglycemics; ICD: Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator; JVD: Jugular Venous Distension; JVP: Jugular Venous Pressure; HJR: Hepatojugular Reflux; LVEDD: Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Diameter; LVESD: Left Ventricular End-Systolic Diameter; LVEF: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction; IVC: Inferior Vena Cava; RAP: Right Atrial Pressure; PASP: Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure; PADP: Pulmonary Artery Diastolic Pressure; PCWP: Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure; CI: Cardiac Index; COP: Cardiac Output; CV: Cardiovascular*
Our study confirms that rise in 1st follow-up creatinine in the setting of aggressive diuresis during ADHF is not associated with worse outcomes, and therefore aggressiveness of diuresis should mainly be guided by volume status rather than renal functions.
- Oumar A, Cissoko Y, Sanogo M, Diallo D, Cissoko M M K, et al. (2021) Impact de la chimio prevention du paludisme sur la morbidite et la mortalite des enfants de 3-59 mois dans le district sanitaire de Dire Mali. Health Sci.Dis 22: 39‑42. [Ref.]
- World Health Organization. [Ref.]
- Adedemy JD, Noudamadjo A, Agossou J (2017) Epidémiologie, clinique et facteurs associés aux infections respiratoires aigues chez l’enfant de 0 - 5 ans au Centre Hospitalier Départemental de Parakou. J afr pediatr genet med 2: 47-53.
- Ahoui S, Noudamadjo A, Kpanidja G, Eteka E, Akoto KOA, et al. (2022) Epidemiological, Clinical, Therapeutic, and Evolutionary Aspects of Acute Kidney Damage during Severe Malaria in Children at the Borgou Departmental Teaching Hospital (Benin). Journal of Renal and Hepatic Disorders 6: 48‑55. [Ref.]
- Eiam-Ong S, Sitprija V (1998) Falciparum malaria and the kidney: a model of inflammation. Am J Kidney Dis 32: 361-75. [Ref.]
- Das B (2008) Renal failure in malaria. J Vector Borne Dis 45: 83-97. [Ref.]
- Silva GBD Junior, Pinto JR, Barros EJG, Farias, GMN, Daher EF (2017) Kidney involvement in malaria: an update. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo 59: e53. [Ref.]
- Katsoulis O, Georgiadou A, Cunnington A (2021) Immunopathology of acute kidney injury in severe malaria. Front Immunol 12: 1-8. [Ref.]
- Trampuz A, Jereb M, Muzlovic I, Prabhu RM (2003) Clinical review: Severe malaria. Crit Care 7: 315-323. [Ref.]
- Lalya F, Sagbo G, Bagnan-Tossa L, Alihonou F, Tohodjede Y, et al. (2023) L’insuffisance rénale aiguë associée au paludisme chez l’enfant au CNHU Hubert K Maga de Cotonou, Bénin. Société de l’Anesthésie Réanimation d’Afrique Francophone. [Ref.]
- Conroy AL, Hawkes M, Elphinstone RE, Morgan C, Hermann L, et al. (2016) Acute Kidney Injury Is Common in Pediatric Severe Malaria and Is Associated With Increased Mortality. Open Forum Infect Dis 3: ofw046. [Ref.]
- Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) (2012) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int Suppl 2: 1-138.[Ref.]
- Schwartz GJ, Haycock GB, Edelmann CM, Spitzer A (1976) A simple estimate of glomerular filtration rate in children derived from body length and plasma creatinine. Pediatrics 58: 259‑263. [Ref.]
- Condé I, Diallo FB, Barry IK, Hyjazi ME, Traore A (2023) Renal failure during severe malaria falciparum plasmodium in children in the pediatric department of Kamsar Hospital. health sciences and disease. 24. [Ref.]
- Essola L. Mowangue PS, Minko J, Ngomas JF, Soami V, et al. (2019) Prise en Charge de l’Insuffisance Rénale Aiguë dans le Paludisme Grave de l’Enfant au Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Libreville. Une Étude de 12 Cas. Health science and diseases. 20: 1-5. [Ref.]
- Ephraim RK, Adoba P, Sakyi SA, Aporeigah J, Fondjo LA, et al. (2020) Acute kidney injury in pediatric patients with malaria: A prospective cross-sectional study in the Shai-Osudoku district of Ghana. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 31: 235‑244. [Ref.]
- Moussa Tondi ZM, Moussa HD, Garba MD, Abdou I, Salamatou N, et al. (2017) Insuffisance rénale aiguë au cours du paludisme grave de l’enfant : expérience des services de pédiatrie des hôpitaux de la ville de Niamey (Niger). Néphrologie & Thérapeutique 13: 361‑362. [Ref.]
- Ndongo AA, Seck N, Thiam L, Sow NF, Faye AA, et al. (2022) L’Insuffisance Rénale Aiguë au Cours du Paludisme de l’Enfant à Dakar. Health Sci Dis 23: 57-60. [Ref.]
- Kunuanunua TS, Nsibu CN, Gini-Ehungu JL, Bodi JM, Ekulu PM, et al. (2013) Insuffisance rénale aiguë dans les formes graves du paludisme chez les enfants vivant à Kinshasa. Néphrologie & Thérapeutique 9: 160‑165. [Ref.]
- Rath D, Sahu MC (2016) The clinical and biochemical features of complicated falciparum malarial nephropathy. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 12:110‑114. [Ref.]
- Samaké M, Touré SM, Sy S, Fofana AS, Coulibaly SB, et al. (2023) Insuffisance rénale aiguë au cours du paludisme grave de l’enfant dans l’unité de néphrologie de l’Hôpital Fousseyni DAOU de Kayes, Mali. Rev Mali Infect Microbiol 18: 11-9. [Ref.]
- Kissou SA, Cessouma R, Barro M, Traoré H, Nacro B (2012) Insuffisance rénale aiguë et paludisme à Plasmodium falciparum : à propos d’un cas. Archives de Pédiatrie 19: 34‑37. [Ref.]
- Duvic C, Rabar D, Didelot F, Nedelec G (2000) Insuffisance rénale aiguë lors d’un accès palustre grave: physiopathologie et prise en charge thérapeutique à propos de deux observations. Médecine tropicale 60: 267-270. [Ref.]
Download Provisional PDF Here
Article Type: CASE REPORT
Citation: Ahoui S, Kpanidja G, Dansou J, Saka S, Bossikponon L, et al. (2025) Factors Associated with Acute Kidney Injury during Malaria in Children at the Borgou and Alibori Departmental Teaching Hospital (Benin). Int J Nephrol Kidney Fail 11(3): dx.doi.org/10.16966/2380-5498.256
Copyright: ©2025 Ahoui S, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Publication history:
SCI FORSCHEN JOURNALS
All Sci Forschen Journals are Open Access
